Real People and Musical Scores

Other People's Property

Real People

Using real people in your fiction or playwriting can throw you into a truly tricky environment.  Generally, if the real person you are using as a character is no longer alive, you’re off the hook.  However, this doesn’t mean that you still can’t be sued (of course). One of the stickier points with regard to using a real person, living or deceased, has to do with what are called “publicity rights” or the Right of Publicity. These rights concern the property right that any person exercises over his/her public image.  As a rule, it seems, the intent of using a public figure’s image or likeness has to be purely for commercial purposes in order for a Right of Publicity suit to work. This is to say, that using a real person in a play or fiction is an artistic use of a person and can be held to be an act of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment–which trumps the Right of Publicity. However, if you’re writing copy for a radio advertisement that uses “Heeeeerrre’s Johnny!” as one of the lines, you likely have used the late Johnny Carson’s Right of Publicity, and, as it is a property right, lives beyond his death and his family/estate can sue you for the use of it.

The Right of Publicity is a property right in many states, and the enforcement is left to the statutory definitions passed in the legislature.  The Right of Publicity is not a federal statute, nor is there any such thing as a privacy right or a right of privacy to which to point (legal fiction).  See Griswold v. Connecticut; and Roe v. Wade.

Beyond the question of the Right of Publicity is the question of defamation. There are several factors that must be considered when determining if there is defamation:

• Statement must be untrue
• published to 3 parties (publication)
• must related to a living person (identification)
• lower the reputation of the person (damages)
• knowledge of untruthfulness (malice)

Note that defamation can also apply to a corporation for all of you activist, anti-corporation playwrights out there. 

There is also a thing called defamation per se (false statements that are immediately considered harmful)–saying that an accountant is a thief; saying that a love rival has an STD; suggesting that someone engages in criminal activity; etc.

For clarification (and the record) libel and slander are forms of defamation (libel is published; slander is spoken).

In the talk given by Sevush and Faux, Faux stated adamantly that “dead is good”; that there is no libel or invasion of privacy for deceased people.  Again, you would have to consult the intent and purpose of the work to determine if Right of Publicity concerns rise to the surface.

With regard to well-known or public figures, the so-called “public figure doctrine” applies (from which the phrase “absence of malice” originates). This doctrine states that “prominent public persons must prove actual malice on the part of the news media in order to prevail in a libel lawsuit. Actual malice is the knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard of whether a statement is true or false.” citation So, you can feel  free to use a public figure in your play, but you had better be certain that your intention is not malicious and that your assertions are absolutely true or are likely true given the inference of certain verifiable facts.  That being said, Sevush pointed to a growing trend amongst high-paid lawyers to engage in what is called “venue shopping” for suits.  For instance, the United Kingdom as a far lower threshold for proving defamation than does the United States, so lawyers might sue you in the UK, get the ruling they want, and then seek to have the ruling imposed in the United States. From what Sevush and Faux stated there are efforts underway in the US to stop this sort of activity from occurring; as it undermines US law.

According to Faux and Sevush, these factors regarding Defamation and Right of Publicity make themselves pertinent to you whenever you license a play to a producer.  That is, you often must sign a statement to the effect that you “warrant and represent” that you own the rights to whatever it is you’re publishing or licensing for performance. The contract might also make you “warrant and represent” that there is nothing defamatory in your work.  Sevush cautioned that playwrights should not make “over-broad declarations” in any contract that they sign–nor should you be forced to–for instance, that your play is not obscene.  Sevush noted that obscenity is decided locally and producer has to decide what he/she/they want to produce and where to produce it–NOT THE PLAYWRIGHT.

Again, the discussion of the Rights of Publicity came up, with a few relevant past cases being highlighted — celebrity (pecuniary, name/likeness for commercial purpose)

• vannah white/
• johnny carson and the portable toilet
• tony twist (doe v tci cablevision)

Often the contract that you sign with a producer can be accompanied by E&O Insurance, short for errors and omissions.  Faux and Sevush encouraged that you should ensure that you are included on this insurance policy if a producer gets it.

Found Scores

Should you use music in your play?  If you are, chances point to the fact that you should get permission to do so.

There are several places that you can go to license music:

• ASCAP
• SESAC
• Harry Fox
• BMI
• Warner/Chappell

When it comes to licensing there are small rights and there are grand rights.  Here is a link to a website that outlines some of the rights that pertain to music and performance. According to the website I link to above, small rights are called “nondramatic performance rights;” and grand rights are called “dramatic performance rights”.  Unfortunately, that sounds clearer than it is.  For instance, simply using the song in a play is not in-and-of-itself the “dramatization” of the song, and so may only require “small rights”–as a song is not inherently dramatic.  If, however, you are “dramatizing” the song, you will need to get “grand rights”.  So, if for some reason you decided to make a play out of the song “Me and Bobby McGee” you would have to get “grand rights.”  Grand rights are usually held by the writer of the song.

Faux and Sevush pointed to ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC for small rights.  Faux and Sevush also noted that grand rights can pertain to the whole of a work — but might also qualify if you are using music to advance the plot or character development in your play. Regardless, they both note that you should assume that you should have to get permission.

Grand rights are what playwrights own with regard to their script (use of songs in a narrative or dramatic way).

Sevush and Faux also discussed parody (fair use, valuable form of comment and criticism) on the subject that is being discussed. They pointed to the use of Roy Orbison’s song “Pretty Woman” by 2 Live Crew.

Parody/Satire Distinction

Parody is directly making fun of one thing, but Satire is using one thing to comment on or make fun of something else (Dr Seuss / OJ Case)

Licensing Music for Your Play

Music should be licensed by the producer.  Sevush was careful to point out that if you, as a playwright, are indicating the use of music in your play that you should note the following distinction:

• Use the words, "and then a song like comes on the radio…"  producer pays
• Use the words, "and then Born to Run by Bruce…" comes on the radio playwright pays

One question that I had, which I didn’t get to ask, is what happens when you contact one of these companies on multiple occasions and get no response?  For my part, in my most recent play Patterns, I went right ahead and used the music.  I figured, if some music publisher made a stink about it, I had the multiple unanswered emails to demonstrate that I had made an effort.

So, I’ve fallen down in terms of updating this blog, but I’ve yet been busy seeing shows and thought I’d just summarize what’s been going on.

Went and saw Valparaiso at convergence. It was great. I was talking with Clyde about the show and he remarked how much the main character’s identity was defined by those around him and the malleable nature of this particular character (as a sort of ‘new’ Everyman).  With this in mind I watched the show carefully and indeed picked up on the commentary that Delillo was making on how empty and soulless some people nowadays can be with their lust for fame and desire for sycophants to cuddle their knees.  In this show the main character becomes famous after getting on a flight for Valparaiso, Indiana and ending up in Valparaiso, Chile.  The fame is unearned. Through endless re-telling of a vapid tale, the character mythologizes himself (in an empty myth).  The character becomes whatever those around him want him to be. His wife cheats on him. And in the end we learn that he was actually attempting to kill himself in the airplane bathroom on the flight to Valparaiso. (An act which can variously be seen as the ultimate narcissistic action or the greatest act of self-nullification.)  There was section of talkshow and audience interaction which I enjoyed, especially as my own show Patterns at CPT used the talkshow as a vehicle for both character and audience engagement.

Next I saw Fever Dream at CPT.  I wasn’t that crazy about the script that Sheila Callaghan put out there and was much more impressed with Crumble (Lay me down Justin Timberlake).  I think it was likely a very difficult play to adapt from the original, with which I am only familiar by having read about.  There were moments in the play that were truly absurd and with a high-potential for strangeness; and then there were other sections where the impulse to create this naturalistic, highly elaborate plot-driven  hulking thing took over that bogged the rest of the strangeness down.  I thought Beth Wood did a fantastic job mixing the tempo, especially with the sections of Callaghan’s script that sort of lumbered along. The choreographed sections were wonderful and the design of the set was stunning and something to see.  Beth clearly encouraged the actors to play with what was possible in the space and move freely, actively, and daringly around it (given some of the things that individuals did).  Despite the periodic clunkiness of the script, I had a fine time at the show.

The Excavation at Theatre Ninjas was the highlight of the shows that I saw.  All around this show I heard from other playwrights, and even my wife who infrequently gets to theatre, that The Excavation is what theater should be.  It was the vanguard of non-linear storytelling, with each “scene” offering up 1) 3 individual scenes from which you could select and 2) having time enough to see two of the individual scenes before the “scene” shifted and the play moved forward.  This fact alone created a possibility for seeing the same play but experiencing it in dozens of different combinations each time.  The play, additionally, highly encouraged inquiry and self-directed engagement (a la museum). I regret, of course, only seeing it one time as clearly there were many, many different ways of seeing this play and many, many different experiences that could be had.  The play was highly interactive, on all fronts.  From the obvious breaking of the fourth wall and potential for direct engagement with the audience/actor; to very direct engagement during the Roman orgy, in which everyone in the space is encouraged to join in and dance, raise hell, drink beer, and so on; to various experiments and “excavations” that are occurring throughout.  In one sequence a “little girl” took myself and another theater-goer to a strange, small space where we had to hide from giants, eat snacks, draw with crayons, and generally “pretend.”  This is something I’m used to, having kids at home, but for those who do not this side trip had to be a blast back to a time when we used our own mind for entertainment and relied much less on the gadgets and devices that seem to clutter our lives nowadays.  Hats off to Jeremy Paul on this piece, because it was fantastic.

After The Excavation my wife and I went to the Vaudevillian Throwdown at Speakeasy, which was another piece of glory in a wonderful Cleveland night.  The two performances were by Pinch and Squeal, doing their very droll burlesque skits and routines (see photo above); followed by Sabrina Chap, who is a magnificent talent and whose music I immediately purchased of iTunes and have been enjoying since.

I even got to meet her and buy her a drink, which was quite an honor as far as I’m concerned.  I also picked up her book, Live Through This: on Creativity and Self-Destruction, which I’m looking forward to digging into soon.

In the mean time, I’ve started writing again and have a few pieces in the hopper. I’ve started helping out with the CPT slush pile. And finally I’ve got a meeting coming up next week to explore a new direction that I hope to go with some others that should be quite exciting!